Chambers of Ishaan Garg
Ch. No. 217, Western Wing, District & Sessions Court, Tis Hazari, New Delhi, Delhi 110054
+91 8851742417, +91 8800386163
But what was contained in Exhibit P-75 was never admitted by A- 7 to be in his handwriting. Exhibit P-75 was marked through PW-30, the handwriting expert, and not even by the I.O. At least if the I.O. had identified and marked the specimen writings and signatures of A-7 as Exhibit P-75, it was possible for the prosecution to contend that the specimen signatures stood proved. But the I.O. did not identify Exhibit P-75. PW-30 through whom Exhibit P-75 was marked did not directly obtain the specimen writings of A-7. The statement of PW-30 that the specimen writings of A-7 are in Exhibit P-75 was only hearsay evidence, as he did not directly obtain those specimen signatures. Thus, Exhibit P- 75 never stood proved. {Para 134}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeal Nos. 2417 of 2010, 16 of 2011 and 2444 of 2010
Decided On: 15.06.2023
A. Srinivasulu Vs. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal, JJ.
Citation: MANU/SC/0723/2023.
