Chambers of Ishaan Garg
Ch. No. 217, Western Wing, District & Sessions Court, Tis Hazari, New Delhi, Delhi 110054
+91 8851742417, +91 880038616
The essential ingredients of dowry death under Indian criminal law remain consistent between the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), with Section 304B of IPC now replaced by Section 80 of BNS.
Essential Ingredients of Dowry Death
The following four essential ingredients must be established to prove dowry death under both legal frameworks:
1. Death by Burns, Bodily Injury, or Unnatural Circumstances
The death of a woman must be caused by burns, bodily injury, or must have occurred otherwise than under normal circumstances. This covers both direct violence and situations where death resulted from neglect or suspicious circumstances.
2. Death Within Seven Years of Marriage
The death must have occurred within seven years of the woman's marriage. This temporal limitation is crucial for the applicability of dowry death provisions.
3. Cruelty or Harassment Before Death
Soon before her death, the woman must have been subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband. The term "soon" does not have a rigid timeframe but emphasizes that the harassment should be a continuing issue that contributed significantly to the woman's death.
4. Connection with Dowry Demand
The cruelty or harassment must be for or in connection with any demand for dowry. A direct or indirect connection between the inflicted cruelty and dowry demands must be established.
Legal Framework: IPC vs BNS
Section 304B IPC (Original Provision)
Under the IPC, dowry death was defined as occurring when a woman dies within seven years of marriage by burns, bodily injury, or under abnormal circumstances, preceded by dowry-related harassment.
Section 80 BNS (Current Provision)
The BNS maintains the same definition and essential ingredients. Section 80 states: "Where the death of a woman is caused by any burns or bodily injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within seven years of her marriage and it is shown that soon before her death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, such death shall be called 'dowry death'".
Key Legal Aspects
Burden of Proof
Once the prosecution establishes these essential ingredients, the burden of proof shifts to the accused under the presumption established by Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act (now Section 118 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam).
Punishment
Both IPC and BNS prescribe the same punishment: imprisonment for a term not less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
Definition of Dowry
For both provisions, "dowry" has the same meaning as defined in Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
The transition from IPC to BNS has maintained the core legal framework for addressing dowry deaths while ensuring continuity in the protection of women against this heinous crime.
Section 113B: Presumption as to Dowry Death
Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act establishes a crucial legal presumption in dowry death cases. The provision states: "When the question is whether a person has committed the dowry death of a woman and it is shown that soon before her death such woman had been subjected by such person to cruelty or harassment for, or in connection with, any demand to dowry, the court shall presume that such person had caused the dowry death".
Essential Conditions for Invoking the Presumption
For the presumption under Section 113B to apply, the prosecution must establish several key elements:
The question before the court must be whether the accused has committed dowry death
The woman was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or his relatives
Such cruelty or harassment was for or in connection with any demand for dowry
Such cruelty or harassment occurred soon before her death
The death should have occurred during the first seven years of her marriage
The phrase "soon before her death" is critical and does not mean months or years before but must be proximate to the death.
Nature of the Presumption
Mandatory Legal Presumption
Section 113B uses the word "shall" rather than "may," making this a presumption of law rather than a discretionary presumption. This means:
The court is obligated to raise the presumption once the essential conditions are met
There is no discretion left with the court to not make the presumption
The presumption becomes binding on the court until evidence is provided to disprove it
Burden of Proof Shift
Once the prosecution establishes the essential ingredients mentioned above, a fundamental shift occurs in the burden of proof:
Before Presumption: The prosecution bears the burden to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
After Presumption: The burden shifts to the accused to lead positive evidence or establish circumstances to negate the presumption.
However, this presumption is rebuttable. The accused must prove that:
The death was not linked to demands for dowry
There was no cruelty or harassment related to dowry demands
The circumstances do not support the presumption of dowry death
Practical Application
The Supreme Court has clarified that while the presumption is mandatory, the prosecution cannot skip proving the essential conditions first. In recent cases, courts have emphasized that if the prosecution fails to prove cruelty or harassment soon before the death, the presumption under Section 113B cannot be invoked.
For example, in cases where witness testimonies contain major contradictions or where no specific acts of cruelty are proven against the accused, courts have refused to apply the presumption, leading to acquittals.
The presumption represents a significant legal tool designed to address the challenges in prosecuting dowry death cases, where direct evidence is often difficult to obtain, while still maintaining the fundamental principle that the presumption must be based on proven facts and remains rebuttable by the defense.
