Recent posts

Internship Opportunity at Sahas Legal Services: Apply Now!!
Job Post of Junior Associate at Chambers of Abhinav Mukerji, APply Now!!
Job Post of Associate at Saaz Partners, Apply Now!!
Online Short Term Internship Opportunity at National Human Rights Commission 2025 : Apply by Sep 3
The Supreme Court recently clarified that the bar under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, which prevents a pendente lite transferee from the judgment-debtor from resisting execution of a decree, does not apply where the objection is raised by a transferee from a third party, who was not a party to the suit.
 The Punjab and Haryana High Court has explained that an accused person can directly approach the High Court for bail only under "exceptional circumstances."
Job Post of Legal Associate at Office, Delhi. Apply Now!!
 The Madras High Court has recently set aside an order of a Family Court asking a husband to pay Rs. 30,000 per month as interim maintenance to his wife till the pendency of a divorce petition filed by him.
Job Post of General Manager (Legal) At National Highways Authority Of India
 Secretly Recorded Spousal Conversations in Matrimonial Proceedings: Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment Balances Privacy and Fair Trial Rights
Supreme court: What are differences in principles for grant of bail and cancellation of bail?
Supreme Court: Appellate or revisional court has power to set aside a bail order that is perverse, unjustified, or passed in violation of settled legal principles
Supreme Court: Prosecution case rests on circumstantial evidence is not a valid ground to release the accused on bail
Supreme Court: An unsustainable bail order does not become valid with the mere passage of time or subsequent behavior of accused
 Supreme court: Whether bail granted on medical grounds can be sustained when the medical necessity is vague and non urgent?
Supreme Court: Whether the court considering bail application for heinous offence should give findings on merits of the case?
Supreme Court: Non-Bailable Warrants Shouldn't Be Issued Unless Accused Charged With Heinous Crime Is Likely To Abscond Or Destroy Evidence
Whether preliminary assessment done by JJB or children's court is vitiated if not completed within the prescribed period?
Whether preliminary assessment done by JJB or children's court is vitiated if it has failed to take assistance psychologist or other experts?
Should JJB or Children's court allow the juvenile to participate in his preliminary assessment?